Alaska House Legislative Ethics Committee Dismisses Complaints Against Lawmakers Over Alleged Misuse of Capitol Offices

Allegations of Allowing Unregistered Lobbyist to Use Offices for Anti-Abortion Activism

The Alaska House Legislative Ethics Committee has dismissed complaints against two state lawmakers, Rep. David Eastman and former Rep. Christopher Kurka, who were accused of allowing an unregistered lobbyist for an anti-abortion organization to use their Capitol offices as a base of operations. The complaints alleged that the lawmakers violated state laws by using public facilities for non-legislative purposes and potentially creating conflicts of interest. After a monthslong process, the committee has dismissed the complaints, but the reasoning behind the decision is yet to be provided.

Allegations and Investigation

The complaints were filed in April 2022 by an anonymous individual against Rep. David Eastman and former Rep. Christopher Kurka. The complaints alleged that the lawmakers allowed Pat Martin, the head of Alaska Right to Life, to use their offices in the state Capitol in Juneau for several hours. Martin had traveled from his home in Wasilla with the intention of distributing signed petitions to the Legislature, calling for a law banning the use of public funds for abortion access.

State law prohibits the use of public facilities for non-legislative purposes and requires lawmakers to avoid conflicts of interest. The complaints alleged that Eastman and Kurka violated these laws. However, an investigation conducted by the legislative ethics committee did not find definitive evidence that Martin had used the facilities inside the lawmakers’ offices during his visit.

Dismissal of Complaints

The legislative ethics committee dismissed the complaints after a prolonged process, which was further delayed by the sudden death of a staff member. The committee has not yet provided the reasoning behind its decision, but a written dismissal order is expected to be published in the coming days. The dismissal signifies that the committee did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegations against Eastman and Kurka.

Testimony and Lobbying Efforts

During the ethics committee hearing, Martin testified about his visit to Juneau and interactions with other lawmakers. He claimed to have faced hostile interactions with Rep. Kevin McCabe and Sen. Shelley Hughes, both Republicans, during his Capitol visit. Martin is not a registered lobbyist with the state, but he was in Juneau lobbying for Alaska Right to Life and delivering anti-abortion petitions to legislators.

The complaints alleged that allowing an activist and lobbyist like Martin to use the lawmakers’ offices as a base of operations was a misuse of state resources. However, Martin stated during the hearing that he spent time in the offices of Eastman and Kurka to take photos with them and the petitions he had brought. He was asked to wait until the lawmakers were finished with other meetings.

Support for Dismissal

Several individuals, including former employees of Eastman and Kurka, called in to the ethics committee meeting to express support for the dismissal of the complaints. They argued that applying sanctions to legislators based on the visits of individuals seeking to have an impact on the public process could chill public contact and hinder the legislative process. Joe Miller, an attorney representing both Kurka and Eastman, emphasized that spending hours in an office should not be equated to conducting a base of operations.

Conclusion: The Alaska House Legislative Ethics Committee has dismissed complaints against Rep. David Eastman and former Rep. Christopher Kurka over allegations of allowing an unregistered lobbyist to use their Capitol offices for anti-abortion activism. The committee’s decision, although not yet accompanied by reasoning, signifies that there was insufficient evidence to support the allegations. The dismissal has sparked discussions about the boundaries of public contact and the potential impact on the legislative process. This case adds to the history of ethics-related controversies involving Rep. David Eastman, who previously violated ethics rules by disclosing committee business to a reporter in 2017.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *