Class action seeks compensation for spectators affected by track incident
A class action lawsuit has been filed against the Las Vegas GP and TAB Contractors Inc. following an incident during the Free Practice 1 session that led to the evacuation of the venue. The lawsuit, filed by the Dimopoulos law firm in conjunction with JK Legal & Consulting, alleges breach of contract, negligence, and deceptive trade practices. Lead lawyer Steve Dimopoulos stated that the aim of the lawsuit is to vindicate the rights of the fans who were deprived of the experience they paid for. The lawsuit seeks compensation for the harm caused to the spectators and claims damages for mental anguish.
Track Incident and Delayed Practice Session
The incident occurred during Free Practice 1 when Carlos Sainz’s car caused a stoppage, leading to a lengthy delay while water valve covers were checked. The practice session was scheduled to start at midnight but was delayed until 2.30am due to the necessary inspections. However, at 1.30am, the venue was cleared of spectators due to staffing and security issues.
Compensation Offered to Affected Spectators
On Friday, spectators who were affected by the incident were offered a $200 voucher to be spent at the venue’s merchandise sites. While this was seen as a gesture of goodwill, it did not address the full extent of the inconvenience and disappointment experienced by the spectators.
Class Action Lawsuit Filed on Behalf of Spectators
On Friday evening, the Dimopoulos law firm, known for handling personal injury cases, filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of the 35,000 spectators who were at the track on Thursday. The lawsuit alleges breach of contract, negligence, and deceptive trade practices against the Las Vegas GP and TAB Contractors Inc., the company responsible for maintaining the track.
Allegations of Poor Track Maintenance
The lawsuit claims that the manhole cover seals, which were installed and inspected by TAB Contractors Inc., were not properly maintained, leading to the incident. It alleges that the track was not in a race-ready condition at the time of the event, despite the completion of recent work by TAB. The lawsuit further argues that F1 and its contractors had a duty to inspect the track and ensure its safety, but failed to detect the flaws and poor installation of the manhole cover.
Refund Issues and Mental Anguish
The lawsuit also references the conditions on the tickets, which state that if the event is canceled and not rescheduled, a refund up to the face value of the ticket should be provided. However, as of the time of filing the lawsuit, none of the affected spectators had received any refunds. The claim seeks money damages to compensate for the harm caused by the defendants and also includes damages for mental anguish.
Conclusion: The class action lawsuit filed against the Las Vegas GP and TAB Contractors Inc. seeks to hold the defendants accountable for the disruption and disappointment experienced by the spectators. The lawsuit alleges negligence and breach of contract, claiming that the track was not in a race-ready condition and that proper safety inspections were not conducted. As the legal proceedings unfold, it remains to be seen how the court will assess the claims and determine the appropriate compensation for the affected spectators.
Leave a Reply