Performance All the Way Down: Rethinking Biology and Gender

Richard Prum’s book challenges traditional notions of sex, gender, and biology

The intersection of biology and gender has long been a contentious and complex topic. In his new book, “Performance All the Way Down: Genes, Development, and Sexual Difference,” evolutionary ornithologist Richard Prum delves into the intricate relationship between biology, sex, and gender. Drawing on both sociobiological and feminist theories, Prum presents a provocative argument that biology, including genes, cells, and hormones, is a choreographed performance that extends beyond behaviors to shape our understanding of sex and gender. However, while his theory offers a fresh perspective, it raises important questions about power dynamics, politics, and the inclusion of marginalized voices.

Challenging the Binary Sex/Gender System

Prum’s book begins by critiquing the normative binary sex/gender/sexuality system that underpins much of our society. He argues that the alleged innateness of biological sex is not as straightforward as it seems, with numerous exceptions undermining the notion of a strict binary. Prum highlights the continuum of traits that exist across sex markers, such as genes, chromosomes, hormones, and behaviors, both in humans and the animal and plant worlds. By questioning the binary, Prum challenges the universal grammar of sex and the anthropomorphization of animal and plant sexual lives.

Performance as a Unifying Theory

Prum’s theory of performance builds on feminist and queer theories, particularly Judith Butler’s concept of gender as a performative act. He argues that biology, including genes, cells, tissues, and hormones, is not a fixed determinant but rather a performative enactment by individual organisms. This perspective challenges traditional notions of causality, suggesting that hormones do not cause behaviors but are instead employed by individual bodies to enact desirable phenotypes. Prum’s theory offers a choreography of molecular, cellular, and organismal intra-actions, integrating biology and society.

Multidisciplinary Approach and the Politics of Science

While Prum’s book attempts to bridge the gap between biology and feminist and queer theories, it falls short in fully acknowledging the politics and power dynamics at play. By juxtaposing separate chapters on feminist and queer theory, Prum fails to integrate the two seamlessly. Moreover, his work lacks a theory of power, which is essential to feminist and queer theories. The book’s depoliticized approach leads to questionable conclusions, such as equating feminist notions of gender/sex with Richard Dawkins’s concept of extended phenotype. Prum’s oversight of politics and power risks reproducing whiteness-related assumptions and perpetuating colonial hierarchies.

The Need for Intersectionality and Inclusion

Prum’s book acknowledges the role of intersectionality in feminist and queer studies but fails to fully integrate race and colonialism into his analysis. By centering reproduction and sexual selection, Prum embraces phenomena that have been critiqued for their involvement in histories of biological determinism. The book’s lack of engagement with race and colonialism limits its understanding of the complexities of sex and gender. Prum’s insistence on the significance of binary sex/gender at higher levels overlooks the diverse possibilities and experiences beyond the male/female binary.

Conclusion:

Prum’s book offers a thought-provoking perspective on the relationship between biology, sex, and gender. However, it falls short in fully addressing the power dynamics, politics, and inclusion of marginalized voices that are central to feminist and queer theories. While his theory of performance opens up new avenues for understanding biology, it is crucial to continually scrutinize the unequal distribution of power across disciplines and foster collaborations that challenge traditional frameworks. By embracing intersectionality and engaging with the complexities of sex and gender, we can move towards a more inclusive and nuanced understanding of biology and its relationship to society.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *